|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- M87 Original 21x21 Median Filter Subtracted Image
|
|
7
|
- What do we want to get from
- this meadian filtered image?
- Numbers of objects
- Positions
- Brightnesses (magnitudes)
- Rejection of non-stellar objects
|
|
8
|
- Ordinary aperture photometry is impossible for crowded fields where
stars are overlapping -- e.g. globular cluster
- One needs to detect and separate the overlapping images
- --- basically a deconvolution!
- Relies on CCDs being linear
devices
- Thus, the PSF (dirty beam) can be shifted, scaled, and fit
- to each overlapping image simultaneously
to give its
- position and brightness
- Much like CLEAN for radio data
- --- several packages, e.g.
DAOPHOT, DOPHOT
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Need to know data
characteristics (gain, read-noise, etc)
- (1) Derive the PSF from isolated,
bright stars
- (2) Find stellar objects in the
frame
- --- look for peaks above
the local sky level
- (3) Obtain initial magnitudes for
those objects
- --- simple aperture
photometry
- (4) ‘Shift-and-Scale’ the PSF and fit to each object
- -- local sky value determined during the
fitting
|
|
11
|
- Original With
found
- Image
objects
-
(TVMARK)
|
|
12
|
- Original
With stars
- Image
fitted and
-
subtracted
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- O(x) = output image (observed)
- H(x) = blurring
function
- N(x) = noise
- I(x) = input image -- what we want to find !!
- Problem: given the observed image O(x) and
- blurring H(x), what was the
original image I(x)?
- Image
Deconvolution
|
|
16
|
- For astronomical imaging, the blurring H(x) arises from:
- -- Earth’s atmosphere
(‘seeing’)
- -- telescope + instrument
(imperfect optics)
- -- detector (e.g. sampling
image with CCD pixels)
- Sum of these = Point Spread
Function (PSF)
- The PSF describes how a point
source of light (e.g. a star)
- is smeared out by all
of the above things
- -- PSF is roughly a (two-dimensional) Gaussian
- -- Radio astronomy
equivalent is ‘Dirty Beam’
|
|
17
|
- Deconvolution is hard: there are
no unique solutions!
- -- many light
distributions will be smeared out
- into the same output
image, within the errors
- Thus, add some constraints:
input image has to be positive,
- smooth and have right noise
properties (Poisson)
- Deconvolution algorithms are usually iterative, using the
- known PSF, and starting with
an initial guess
- Have to worry about increased noise,
and photometric
- accuracy
|
|
18
|
- Van Cittert (1931)!
- take the output image O(x) as the first approximation to the input image
I(x)
- blur this first approximation and compare with the true output image
O(x)
- the difference between the two is used as a correction to our
initial estimate for I(x)
- Iterate until the model ‘agrees’ with real output image O(x)
|
|
19
|
- Richardson-Lucy (Richardson 1972, Lucy 1974)
- -- one of the most commonly
used, especially with
- pre-refurbishment HST
images
- -- also an iterative method,
but using Poisson statistics,
- which also forces input
image to be positive
- Image(n+1) = Image(n) x
Original data * Reflect(PSF)
-
Image(n)*PSF
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- Maximum Entropy (Skilling and Brian 1984)
- -- maximizes the entropy: here this
means that the model brightness distribution should be as close as
possible to actual brightness distribution on sky
- -- often used to sharpen radio maps
- Dithering and Drizzling (Space
Telescope, ESO, 1994--)
- -- extensively used with HST/WFPC2 data
- -- here shifted images are used to
effectively carry out
- finer sampling of the
image -- ‘sharper’ PSF
- -- more recently MCS deconvolution
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Image taken with HST/WFPC2 and restored using the
- MCS algorithm
|
|
26
|
- A wide variety of image processing software packages are available both
as freeware and as sophisticated commercial packages
- Many have direct application to astronomical images and image processing
problems
- Some are available to the general and amateur community (e,g, MIRA)
- Professional astronomers make use of a range of software packages
developed specifically with astronomical image processing requirements
in mind
- The most common astronomical IP packages come under the umbrella titles
of:
- iraf (developed in USA - very complex, hierarchical extensive library
of ip products)
- Midas (developed for ESO and European astronomers)
- STARLINK packages (developed in UK) such as KAPPA, PISA, GAIA
|